We recently convened an expert roundtable to tackle how health systems, payers, and providers can spur the ‘de-adoption’ of medical practices and technologies no longer considered valuable. This got us thinking - while the process by which ineffective practices or technologies are abandoned is neither simple nor automatic, even the language used to describe it is not clear. And language matters. It often reflects an unstated focus on one mechanism or one level of decision-making. Here we review, and potentially clarify, the terminology.
Comparing International and United States Undergraduate Medical Education and Surgical Outcomes Using a Refined Balance Matching Methodology
In Annals of Surgery, Salman Zaheer and colleagues, including LDI Senior Fellow Rachel Kelz, compare surgical outcomes of international medical graduates (IMGs) and United States medical graduates (USMGs). Medical education outside of the US is substantially different from that in the US and usually begins right after high school and lasts for 5 to 7 years. This is the first study to examine differences in surgical outcomes of patients treated by IMGs and USMGs. The authors used a unique dataset linking AMA Physician Masterfile data with hospital discharge claims from Florida and...
As the latest jobs report shows, growth in employment in the health care sector continues to be, well, healthy. Others have pointed out that this may not be a good thing, especially if it crowds out jobs in other industries, taking up resources that would otherwise go to producing more valuable goods and services.
Last week the Surgeon General, Dr. Vivek Murthy, released the groundbreaking, comprehensive report Facing Addiction in American: The Surgeon General’s Report on Alcohol, Drugs, and Health. The report comes at a critical juncture, with more than 27 million Americans misusing illicit and prescription drugs, and more than 66 million misusing alcohol.
The notion of value is at once one of the most widely invoked and variably interpreted in American health care.
Penn Center for Community Health Workers: Step-by-Step Approach to Sustain an Evidence-Based Community Health Worker Intervention at an Academic Medical Center
In the American Journal of Public Health, Anna Morgan and colleagues, including Dave Grande, Judith Long, and Shreya Kangovi, describe the process by which Penn’s Center for Community Health Workers grew from a small grant-funded research project into a robust program serving 2,000 patients annually and funded through the health system’s operational budget. The authors describe an 8-step framework to engage both low-income patients and funders, determine outcomes, and calculate return on investment. The case illustrates a path toward sustainability for other community-based...