Pregnancy Can Turn Deadly Before Prenatal Care Begins
LDI Fellow and OB-GYN Calls for Faster Testing and Better Early-Pregnancy Care
In Their Own Words
The following excerpt is from an op-ed originally published in PennLive on September 23, 2026.
Pennsylvania faces a harsh reality: The federal government has made the largest cuts to SNAP in recent history. It will only get worse. Pennsylvania will need to find more than half a billion dollars a year to keep its largest anti-hunger program and prevent more people from using food pantries.
Maintaining the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is critical because more families are going hungry now than at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic.
That’s why Pennsylvania should place a tax on the distributors of sweetened drinks and use the tax revenue to support SNAP. As researchers who have studied nutrition and hunger for more than two decades, we believe the tax will ensure that more Pennsylvanians do not go hungry while helping the state economy thrive.
The federal 2025 Reconciliation Act has already slashed the number of SNAP recipients in Pennsylvania by 12% after imposing new rules. Starting next month, the law will enter a dangerous new phase by requiring states to cover 75% rather than 50% of SNAP’s administrative costs. This will cost the Commonwealth an extra $130 million annually.
Read the full op-ed here.


LDI Fellow and OB-GYN Calls for Faster Testing and Better Early-Pregnancy Care
Why a 2020 Federal Price Transparency Initiative has yet to Produce a Consumer Shopping Revolution
Cash Incentives Doubled Quit Rates Among High-Risk Patients, Penn LDI Study Finds
Penn Study Finds Fewer Fatal Overdoses on Blocks Where Vacant Buildings were Sealed
AI May Be a Scalable Way to Educate Transplant Patients, but its Clinical Impact Remains Unclear
New Study Focuses on Boarding Transition Time to Inpatient Medical Care