Nursing Home Incentive Program Falls Flat, New Work Explains Potential Reasons
A Major Federal Value-Based Purchasing Program Was Designed to Cut Hospital Readmissions. LDI Fellows Say the Incentives Are Too Small to Drive Real Change
Blog Post
Safe Nurse Staffing Saves Lives and Money Across the World
Mandated Nurse-to-Patient Ratios Have Cut Deaths, Eased Burnout, and Saved Millions. Policymakers Must Act Now to Protect Patients
Print:
Hospitals cannot function without nurses. But across the globe—and especially here in the U.S.—nurses are stretched thin by unsafe workloads and chronic understaffing. The result? Burnout, moral distress, and an exodus of experienced nurses from the bedside—with serious consequences for patients.
A new international policy brief from the Center for Health Outcomes and Policy Research (CHOPR) at Penn Nursing provides the strongest case yet for mandated nurse-to-patient ratios as a proven, cost-effective policy to improve nurse retention, patient safety, and health equity.
These aren’t experimental ideas anymore. From California to Queensland, Australia, governments that implemented safe staffing laws have saved lives, improved outcomes, and avoided added costs—even without increased public funding.
Key Findings
- Every additional patient assigned to a nurse increases the risk of death by 7%.
- California’s landmark ratio law, implemented 20 years ago, has led to better staffing, less burnout, and improved patient outcomes—without causing hospital closures or requiring additional state funding.
- In Queensland, Australia, staffing ratio reforms in the first two years led to 145 fewer deaths and $70 million in cost savings, more than enough to finance the cost of employing more nurses.
- Other approaches, like staffing committees and public reporting, have failed to consistently improve nurse staffing or outcomes.
Why This Matters More Than Ever
With massive federal funding cuts unfolding across sectors, the stakes for hospitals, policymakers, and patients are rising fast. Investing in nurse staffing may seem costly upfront, but the data shows it saves lives and money—particularly in vulnerable communities where burnout and turnover are highest. Now is the time for policymakers to act—not with more studies, but with enforceable staffing standards that protect patients and keep experienced nurses at the bedside.
The Bottom Line
We cannot train our way out of the nurse staffing crisis. To rebuild a stable nursing workforce and improve care, we need bold policy reforms that guarantee safe and manageable workloads. The evidence—from California to Queensland—is no longer theoretical. Safe staffing saves lives.
Read the full brief here.
Author
Linda H. Aiken, PhD, RN
Claire Fagin Leadership Professor, Penn Nursing; Professor, Sociology, School of Arts and Sciences; Founding Director, Center for Health Outcomes and Policy Research, Penn Nursing
More from LDI
New APHA Book Warns Social Systems Are Driving Deepening Health Inequities
Penn LDI’s Antonia Villarruel and 10 Other Authors Map Social Determinants Across Multiple Racial and Ethnic Groups
Analysis of the Rural Health Transformation Program
Memo: Response to Request for Analysis
Reforming Long-Term Care Policy
Lessons from the Past, Imperatives for the Future
Inside ICE Detention: Many Facilities Operated Without Qualified Health Staff
A New Study of a Sample of Facilities Found Half Without Any Behavioral Health Staff
New National Study Finds Doctors Paid Less for Treating Black and Hispanic Patients
Physicians Were Paid About 10% Less for Visits Involving Black and Hispanic Patients, With Pediatric Gaps Reaching 15%, According to a First-of-Its-Kind LDI Analysis