Late last year, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announced that more than 70,000 people died from drug overdoses in 2017, a 9.6% increase from 2016. Deaths continue to soar, even as states and health systems implement policies to curb the overprescribing of opioids that led to the epidemic in the first place. It’s hard not to be discouraged by these numbers and our failure to reduce overdose deaths. To fully appreciate the shifting dynamics of the opioid crisis, we need to understand both the nature of the policies we are implementing as well as their likely short- and long-term effects.
New research shows that young citizen children were more likely to receive important social services when their undocumented mothers became eligible for the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program. Providing evidence of the multi-generational spillover effects of immigration policy, this new analysis comes as the U.S. House of Representatives is on the brink of forcing a vote on a permanent solution for recipients of the DACA Program.
Medicaid’s federal-state partnership structure has long permitted states to adopt modifications to coverage design, including benefits and cost-sharing. That structure, combined with an Administration signaling its support for greater state flexibility and funding constraints, could produce substantial shifts in state Medicaid policy.
Several states, including some that reluctantly implemented Medicaid expansion and some contemplating it, have asked for federal permission to link Medicaid eligibility to labor force participation—working or looking for work. As with everything in health policy these days, this idea is controversial, with disagreement even about the facts but more fundamentally about subjective social values.
LDI Senior Fellow Julie A. Fairman, PhD, RN, FAAN made history last week as she became the first nurse to deliver the prestigious Garrison lecture at the American Association for the History of Medicine’s 91st annual meeting in Los Angeles.
Family caregivers of hospitalized patients will get much needed support and guidance in the 39 U.S. states and territories that have enacted versions of the Caregiver Advise, Record, Enable (CARE) Act. To achieve the intended public health outcomes, however, the needs of diverse communities, such as Latinos, immigrants, and other marginalized groups, must be considered as these policies are implemented.
On May 2 and 3, the School of Nursing sponsored a multidisciplinary “Think Tank” devoted to improving care for older adults with chronic illness. Led by Mary Naylor and Nancy Hodgson, it drew more than 40 external thought leaders, who joined Penn experts from across the University. You’ll be hearing much more in the coming weeks about the Think Tank’s recommendations, but from a policy perspective, it could not have come at a better time.
For the nearly 30 million people in the U.S. who have no health insurance, gaining access to care and paying for that care can be a challenge. A new “secret shopper” study explores whether the uninsured can get a new primary care appointment, and at what price. To understand what it’s like to be uninsured, a new Bloomberg News project provides the personal stories behind the statistics, highlighting why and how some Americans are going without health insurance.
The American Dental Association (ADA) recently announced a new policy on opioid prescription. This is the latest in a series of ADA statements in response to the prominent role of dentistry in the opioid epidemic. In addition to mandatory continuing education and prescription limits, the ADA indicated its support for “dentists registering with and utilizing prescription drug monitoring programs to promote the appropriate use of opioids and deter misuse and abuse.”
Engaging patients, families, and independent experts in policymaking is a laudable goal, but the process of doing so isn’t necessarily straightforward. If efforts to introduce patient and public perspectives also introduce bias, they may do more harm than good. In JAMA Internal Medicine, Matthew McCoy, Genevieve Kanter, and colleagues raise concerns that FDA public engagement is rife with conflicts of interest), which are frequently undisclosed.
Our health and social systems are ill-equipped to meet the needs of the growing population of older adults with chronic conditions and their family caregivers. We are living longer, but are we living better? A new invitational “Think Tank,” led by Mary Naylor, PhD, RN and Nancy Hodgson, PhD, RN and sponsored by Penn’s School of Nursing, is looking to address these needs through the leadership and skills of the largest and most trusted segment of the health care workforce: nurses.
Spending on cancer drugs in the U.S. has nearly doubled in the past five years and continues to grow, imposing substantial financial burden on patients with cancer. One of the biggest drivers of this growth is targeted cancer drugs – small molecules, monoclonal antibodies, and other therapies for cancer that target specific genomic aberrations. LDI Senior Fellows Justin Bekelman and Steve Joffe propose three solutions to maximize the clinical benefit and affordability of targeted cancer drugs.
As the largest single source of health care spending, hospitals have drawn considerable attention from policymakers. Efforts to reduce costs have led to decreased lengths of hospital stays, but far less attention has been paid to where those patients go immediately after discharge. Medicare payment reforms implemented in the wake of the Affordable Care Act have made hospitals accountable for care beyond their walls, including institutional post-acute care. In a new Research Letter in JAMA, Rachel Werner and R. Tamara Konetzka assess how post-acute care has changed for Medicare beneficiaries from 2000-2015.