Marilyn Schapira Honored with Perelman School of Medicine Award
Recipient of 2024 Samuel Martin Health Evaluation Sciences Research Award
In Their Own Words
Another Threat to Abortion Privacy? Health Websites Tracking and Sharing Your Data
Researchers Sound the Alarm
Print:
The following excerpt is from an op-ed that first appeared in The Los Angeles Times on December 29, 2022.
In the privacy of her home, a woman searches for the nearest abortion clinic. She read a news article about Google deleting abortion search data, so she uses Google to find a clinic just over the border from her state, which recently banned the procedure.
When she visits the clinic webpage, however, Google and Facebook — plus a dozen other companies — record her activity thanks to third-party tracking code embedded on the clinic’s webpage. They know that she clicked on the page to find the clinic’s address, and that she read information on how to prepare for an abortion at that clinic.
Our research team at the University of Pennsylvania’s School of Medicine and Carnegie Mellon’s CyLab found that 99% of abortion clinic webpages surveyed have at least one third-party tracker on their site. The situation is usually worse: The average clinic webpage transfers data to nine different companies. Across all abortion clinics in the U.S., we found that trackers sent data to 66 different companies, from tech behemoths to businesses with little or no consumer-facing presence.
The tracked information can be sold and resold with virtually no limit on how it can be used. Companies can send a woman targeted ads based on her likely having obtained an abortion. Prosecutors in her state can use that data to provide evidence that she did.
Even private citizens can purchase lists of people who visited abortion clinic webpages, then use those names to initiate lawsuits against providers and patients under laws such as Texas’ Senate Bill 8. It may seem shocking that an abortion clinic would transfer visitors’ browsing data to for-profit companies. But the practice is a symptom of an online health privacy crisis that’s been years in the making.
Read the entire op-ed, here.
Authors
Ari Friedman, MD, PhD
Assistant Professor, Emergency Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine
Matthew McCoy, PhD
Assistant Professor, Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine
More from LDI
Patients Do Better When Care Teams Collaborate
But Professionals Must Learn from Each Other to Bond as a Team
Unfinished Business: Tackling Fragmented Care for Dual Eligibles
Second Penn LDI 2024 Meeting on the Issue Discusses Policy Recommendation Details
Medicare Advantage: LDI Fellows’ Findings On The Largest Part of Medicare
A Digest of LDI Research on Equity, Costs, and Care in Medicare Advantage Over The Last Two Years
Investing In Safety: Reimbursing Safe Firearm Storage Counseling
Leveraging Medicaid to Prioritize Pediatric Safety and Prevent Firearm Injuries
What C-Suite Nurse Leaders Say About LGBTQ+ Inclusion in Health Care
Inclusive Care Needs Action and Intention, LDI Fellow Says
Worker Wages Stagnate as Medicaid Home Care Spending Rises
Raising Reimbursement Rates and Wages Would Support a Stable Workforce and Better Care, LDI Fellows Say
Five LDI Senior Fellows Win Grants to Study Transitional Housing for People with HIV
Project Funded Through a Partnership of LDI, Penn CFAR and the City of Philadelphia