Hanming Fang Wins Best Article Award from Japanese Economic Review
Penn LDI Senior Fellow Paper Focused on the Mental Health of Older Chinese
In Their Own Words
Another Threat to Abortion Privacy? Health Websites Tracking and Sharing Your Data
Researchers Sound the Alarm
Print:
The following excerpt is from an op-ed that first appeared in The Los Angeles Times on December 29, 2022.
In the privacy of her home, a woman searches for the nearest abortion clinic. She read a news article about Google deleting abortion search data, so she uses Google to find a clinic just over the border from her state, which recently banned the procedure.
When she visits the clinic webpage, however, Google and Facebook — plus a dozen other companies — record her activity thanks to third-party tracking code embedded on the clinic’s webpage. They know that she clicked on the page to find the clinic’s address, and that she read information on how to prepare for an abortion at that clinic.
Our research team at the University of Pennsylvania’s School of Medicine and Carnegie Mellon’s CyLab found that 99% of abortion clinic webpages surveyed have at least one third-party tracker on their site. The situation is usually worse: The average clinic webpage transfers data to nine different companies. Across all abortion clinics in the U.S., we found that trackers sent data to 66 different companies, from tech behemoths to businesses with little or no consumer-facing presence.
The tracked information can be sold and resold with virtually no limit on how it can be used. Companies can send a woman targeted ads based on her likely having obtained an abortion. Prosecutors in her state can use that data to provide evidence that she did.
Even private citizens can purchase lists of people who visited abortion clinic webpages, then use those names to initiate lawsuits against providers and patients under laws such as Texas’ Senate Bill 8. It may seem shocking that an abortion clinic would transfer visitors’ browsing data to for-profit companies. But the practice is a symptom of an online health privacy crisis that’s been years in the making.
Read the entire op-ed, here.
Authors
Ari Friedman, MD, PhD
Assistant Professor, Emergency Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine
Matthew McCoy, PhD
Assistant Professor, Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine
More from LDI
A Small Gift Card Grew Diverse Enrollment for Trials in Children
Incentives Worked Better than Culturally Tailored Videos, LDI Fellows Found
The Missing Link for Regulating AI Systems in Health
We Need Watchful Eyes at the Bedside, Two LDI Fellows Say
Chart of the Day: Here are the Most Lucrative Heart Procedures for Hospitals
The Big Moneymaker is a Common Cardiac Surgery, Study by LDI Fellows Finds
A Special Medicaid Program
To Speed Eligibility Still Leaves Delays in Care
Some Who Get Medicaid When Injured Have Longer Hospital Stays and Higher Costs, LDI Fellow’s Study Finds
Quantifying Firearm-Related Hospitalizations: A Growing U.S. Public Health Crisis
Exploring Disparities, Hospitalization Outcomes, and Policy Solutions with LDI Fellow Nadir Yehya
Penn LDI Small Grants Program 2025 Projects Announced
14 LDI Fellows Get Early-Stage Funding for a Range of Health Care Research Projects
Why Nursing Homes Should Provide More Nurses and Aides to Residents
CMS Raised Staffing Minimums in Nursing Homes Last Year, Marking a Major Improvement. Now These Rules Are Under Threat