Black Older Adults With Cancer Are Far Less Likely to Get Any Care
New Study From LDI and MD Anderson Finds That Black and Low-Income, Dually Eligible Medicare Patients Are Among the Most Neglected in Cancer Care
Blog Post
Chart of the Day: Information, Relative Skill, and Technology Abandonment
Oncologists’ Reactions to an FDA Warning Discouraging Minimally Invasive Hysterectomies Show Skill Differences Can Prevent the Translation of Evidence into Practice
Print:
While it is widely known that skill levels differ among physicians, it is not known how these skill differences affect their treatment choices. An unexpected safety warning from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration about minimally invasive hysterectomies offered us an opportunity to evaluate how a negative information shock affects clinical practice across physicians with different skill levels.
My colleague Bingxiao Wu and I evaluated data from patients who received either minimally invasive or open hysterectomies between January 2012 and September 2015 in Florida. We found that after the FDA issued a safety warning in April 2014, discouraging the use of laparoscopic power morcellation during minimally invasive hysterectomies due to evidence that it could spread undetected malignant tissue, oncologists shifted toward performing open procedures and away from the minimally invasive procedures. However, as the above chart shows, oncologists who were more skilled in performing minimally invasive procedures were far less likely to abandon this procedure compared to those who were less skilled in these procedures.
The results speak directly to policies that aim to integrate evidence-based medicine with individual practice. They demonstrate that differences in physician skill can be a key barrier to translating evidence into practice. Policies that ignore these differences may lead to negative consequences, including medical complications and, in rare cases, death.
The study, Information, Relative Skill, and Technology Abandonment, was published in the Journal of Health Economics in May 2022. Authors include Bingxiao Wu and Guy David.
Author
Guy David, PhD
Allen B. Miller Professor, Health Care Management, Wharton School; Professor, Health Policy and Medical Ethics, Perelman School of Medicine; Chair, Health Care Management, Wharton School
More from LDI
When Medicare Sent Patients Home Sooner, Mary Naylor Built the Safety Net
Her Transitional Care Model Shows How Nurse-Led Care Can Keep Older Adults Out of the Hospital and Change Care Worldwide
Integrated Care Plans Didn’t Boost Medicaid Enrollment for the Poorest Seniors
Chart of the Day: Medicare-Medicaid Plans—Created to Streamline Care for Dually Eligible Individuals—Failed to Increase Medicaid Participation in High-Poverty Communities
After Fifteen Years, is Value-Based Care Succeeding?
Penn LDI Debates the Pros and Cons of Payment Reform
At-Home Alzheimer’s Blood Tests Surge, But Experts Warn the U.S. Isn’t Ready
Direct-to-Consumer Alzheimer’s Tests Risk False Positives, Privacy Breaches, and Discrimination, LDI Fellow Warns, While Lacking Strong Accuracy and Much More
National Academy of Medicine Issues Code of Conduct to Guide Health Care’s AI Revolution
One of the Authors, Penn’s Kevin B. Johnson, Explains the Principles It Sets Out
Turning Upheaval into Opportunity for U.S. Health Information
Six Lessons the U.S. Can Learn from Europe About Protecting Health Data Linkages
Employment Protections for Individuals Experiencing Menstruation, Perimenopause, or Menopause
Testimony: Delivered to Philadelphia City Council’s Committee on Labor and Civil Service