Insurers’ Utilization Management Tools Vary Widely on Anti-Nausea Drugs for Cancer
Chart of the Day: LDI Researchers Report Major Coverage Differences Across ACA and Medicaid Plans, Affecting Access to Drugs That Treat Chemo-Related Nausea
In Their Own Words
Two Looming Crises Threaten to Collapse U.S. Long-Term Care
Immigration Crackdown and Medicaid Cuts Put Millions at Risk
Print:
The following excerpt is from an op-ed that first appeared in STAT News on May 30th, 2025.
The U.S. is facing two major threats to long-term care, and either could topple our precarious system. These developments should worry Congress and anyone who supports an aging loved one or a family member with disabilities.
The first threat is the ongoing immigration crackdown. Immigrants comprise 28% of the entire long-term care workforce along with one in three home care workers, providing vital frontline care to older adults and people with disabilities. Recent estimates suggest that 15% of immigrant workers at home care agencies are undocumented; however, even lawful permanent residents have been caught up in recent deportation efforts.
These workers fill critical gaps in a sector that has been plagued by worker shortages for decades, a situation that has grown more dire since the Covid-19 pandemic. Our research suggests that the threat of deportation will only worsen these shortages, hurting people who need care and their family members. Policies that separate immigrant caregivers from their communities threaten both vulnerable Americans and the frontline workers who sustain them. For the nation’s long-term care system, these policies represent an existential threat.
The trouble doesn’t stop there. Medicaid, the nation’s largest funder of long-term care, could soon see the largest cuts in its 60-year history. Republicans in Congress are seeking $880 billion in Medicaid cuts to finance the president’s domestic agenda, a terrifying prospect for the nearly 6 million people who rely on Medicaid for long-term care. The House bill that passed on May 22, for example, would eliminate critical options that states use to finance their share of Medicaid costs.
Medicaid cuts will force difficult decisions onto state officials, who struggle to adequately fund long-term care even in the absence of proposed cuts. Already, more than 700,000 people are on waiting lists for services. Further shifting these costs onto states may result in fewer services, with home-based support for older Americans a likely target for cuts, because it is an optional benefit.
See the full op-ed here.
Authors
Rachel M. Werner, MD, PhD
Executive Director, Penn LDI; Robert D. Eilers Memorial – William Maul Measey Professorship in Health Care Management and Economics, Wharton School; Professor, Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine
Amanda R. Kreider, PhD
Assistant Professor, Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health
More on Health Care Access & Coverage
Why You May Have Fewer Health Insurance Choices Than Your Neighbor
Insurers Avoid Counties With Small Populations and Poor Health but a New LDI Study Finds Limited Evidence of Anticompetitive Behavior
Acupuncture Could Fix America’s Chronic Pain Crisis–So Why Can’t Patients Get It?
A Proven, Low-Risk Treatment Is Backed by Major Studies and Patient Demand, Yet Medicare and Insurers Still Make It Hard To Use
Integrated Care Plans Didn’t Boost Medicaid Enrollment for the Poorest Seniors
Chart of the Day: Medicare-Medicaid Plans—Created to Streamline Care for Dually Eligible Individuals—Failed to Increase Medicaid Participation in High-Poverty Communities
Less Postacute Care for Medicare Advantage Beneficiaries Does Not Mean Worse Health
Research Brief: Shorter Stays in Skilled Nursing Facilities and Less Home Health Didn’t Lead to Worse Outcomes, Pointing to Opportunities for Traditional Medicare
The Unseen Fallout of Abortion Bans
How Threatened Reproductive Rights Pushed More Pennsylvanians Toward Sterilization