New APHA Book Warns Social Systems Are Driving Deepening Health Inequities
Penn LDI’s Antonia Villarruel and 10 Other Authors Map Social Determinants Across Multiple Racial and Ethnic Groups
Blog Post

Payers, providers, and policymakers are increasingly recognizing that social factors — such as access to transportation or safe housing — significantly drive patient outcomes and medical costs. As a result, health systems are developing approaches to couple social needs assessments with medical care.
The hope is that by screening for social needs, health systems can develop interventions that lead to better outcomes. Implementation of these social needs screening programs is also supported by newer payment models. Less is known, however, about patient comfort and opinions regarding social needs screening.

Our team conducted a study to better understand patients’ perspectives on the ways health systems collect data about their social needs. As we reported in the American Journal of Managed Care, our main question to the 54 patients we interviewed was this: What do you think about health systems asking you sensitive questions about your life? We asked about their comfort with so-called “social needs” screening, their understanding of why the health systems conduct the screening, and any important factors affecting their experience with the screening process.

Most patients in our study said they did not mind being screened for social needs. In fact, many reported that the screening process provided a space to discuss issues they otherwise would not share with their clinician. They also appreciated the direct relationship being drawn between their social needs and their health.
Some patients raised concerns related to feelings of shame, stigma, and privacy. Some also expressed feeling reluctant to respond to social needs screening if they were unsure why the questions were being asked.
Patients valued the convenience, ease, and efficiency in the process. They viewed screenings that took place during visit waiting periods as sparing them the inconvenience of completing screenings on their own time. Barriers to technology-based screening included limited comfort with technology, difficulty reading phone-based text, and language and literacy issues. Some patients who noted that that they were not “computer people” said they were open to completing the screening if someone assisted them with the technology.
Several patients felt they needed a strong relationship with their clinician to discuss their social needs. Some raised the issue of power dynamics – particularly around status, race, and gender – as influencing the comfort in engaging around social needs.
For primary care practices and health systems looking to implement more patient-centered social needs screening, we suggest the following:
The study “Patient Perspectives on Technology-Based Approaches to Social Needs Screening,” was published in The American Journal of Managed Care on January 16, 2023. Authors include Allison J. Hare, Katherine Honig, Peter F. Cronholm, Samira Shabazz-McKlaine, and Anna U. Morgan.



Penn LDI’s Antonia Villarruel and 10 Other Authors Map Social Determinants Across Multiple Racial and Ethnic Groups
A New Study of a Sample of Facilities Found Half Without Any Behavioral Health Staff
Physicians Were Paid About 10% Less for Visits Involving Black and Hispanic Patients, With Pediatric Gaps Reaching 15%, According to a First-of-Its-Kind LDI Analysis
New Study From LDI and MD Anderson Finds That Black and Low-Income, Dually Eligible Medicare Patients Are Among the Most Neglected in Cancer Care
Equitably Improving Care for Hospitalized Kids Who Experience Cardiac Arrest Requires Hospital-Level Changes, LDI Fellows Say
Billing Codes That Flag Food, Job, or Housing Insecurity in Medical Records are Underused for the Sickest Medicare Patients