
NIH on the Brink: How to Fund Medical Breakthroughs in the Trump–Kennedy Era
With Drastic Cuts on the Table, What’s the Best Way To Fund Medical Innovation – NIH Grants, Prizes, or Bold New Models?
Population Health
In Their Own Words
This op-ed was posted in The Philadelphia Inquirer on Sept 18, 2025.
As Philadelphia’s former Health Commissioner, I know that sooner or later, we will face another grave public health emergency.
Besides the COVID-19 pandemic, my nearly three years as the head of Philly’s health department included the mpox outbreak, the arrival of multiple displaced populations with urgent medical needs, and a measles outbreak. We saw wildfires in Canada that led to the worst air pollution the city has seen in decades and a spill of chemical contaminants into our water supply. We needed to keep city residents safe and informed about those flare-ups while maintaining our day-to-day work to protect the public’s health, like tackling the city’s high rates of smoking, chronic disease, overdose deaths, and maternal mortality.
Whether it is a new pandemic, a toxic threat to our drinking water, or a crisis we cannot yet imagine, recent experience teaches us that we will continue to face public health emergencies. But in the face of Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s reckless and uninformed approach to the protection of American lives, future emergencies will be far more harmful and deadly than in the past.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) normally serves as a resource during public health crises, its deep bench of experts offering recommendations and vetted research that inform real-time decisions by local public health leaders. With the CDC’s leadership and expertise gutted, and their decades of experience lost, we cannot count on those resources to be available. This loss will take years, if not decades, to rebuild. Even worse, the forced departure of thousands of dedicated, veteran scientists and the substitution of social media influencers and appointees chosen for their loyalty to President Trump in place of nonpartisan leaders picked for their expertise, means that we may be unable to count on the reliability of information and guidance the CDC provides…
See the full piece here.
With Drastic Cuts on the Table, What’s the Best Way To Fund Medical Innovation – NIH Grants, Prizes, or Bold New Models?
An Analysis of Penn Medicine Healthy Heart Program Provides Insights
From 1990 to 2019, Black Life Expectancy Rose Most in Major Metros and the Northeast—but Gains Stalled or Reversed in Rural Areas and the Midwest, Especially for Younger Adults.
Findings Suggest That Improving Post-Acute Care Means Looking Beyond Caseloads to Nursing Home Quality
They Reduce Coverage, Not Costs, History Shows. Smarter Incentives Would Encourage the Private Sector
The 2018 MISSION Act Cut Travel Times for Veterans Needing Major Heart Procedures but That Came With More Complications in VA Community Care