
Health Care Access & Coverage
In Their Own Words
Another Threat to Abortion Privacy? Health Websites Tracking and Sharing Your Data
Researchers Sound the Alarm
The following excerpt is from an op-ed that first appeared in The Los Angeles Times on December 29, 2022.
In the privacy of her home, a woman searches for the nearest abortion clinic. She read a news article about Google deleting abortion search data, so she uses Google to find a clinic just over the border from her state, which recently banned the procedure.
When she visits the clinic webpage, however, Google and Facebook — plus a dozen other companies — record her activity thanks to third-party tracking code embedded on the clinic’s webpage. They know that she clicked on the page to find the clinic’s address, and that she read information on how to prepare for an abortion at that clinic.
Our research team at the University of Pennsylvania’s School of Medicine and Carnegie Mellon’s CyLab found that 99% of abortion clinic webpages surveyed have at least one third-party tracker on their site. The situation is usually worse: The average clinic webpage transfers data to nine different companies. Across all abortion clinics in the U.S., we found that trackers sent data to 66 different companies, from tech behemoths to businesses with little or no consumer-facing presence.
The tracked information can be sold and resold with virtually no limit on how it can be used. Companies can send a woman targeted ads based on her likely having obtained an abortion. Prosecutors in her state can use that data to provide evidence that she did.
Even private citizens can purchase lists of people who visited abortion clinic webpages, then use those names to initiate lawsuits against providers and patients under laws such as Texas’ Senate Bill 8. It may seem shocking that an abortion clinic would transfer visitors’ browsing data to for-profit companies. But the practice is a symptom of an online health privacy crisis that’s been years in the making.
Read the entire op-ed, here.
Authors

Ari Friedman, MD, PhD
Assistant Professor, Emergency Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine

Matthew McCoy, PhD
Assistant Professor, Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine
More from LDI

Does Schooling Improve Cognitive Abilities at Older Ages?
Causal Evidence From Nonparametric Bounds

Text Messages to Ask Patients About Health Care Experiences
Q&A on Patient-Reported Racism and Emergency Department Care
What Can We Learn from Pandemic-Related Changes to NICU Follow-Up Care?
Telemedicine Cannot Smooth Care Transitions for all Patients

Clinical Research Forum Names Penn Medicine Paper a Finalist in Top 20 Awards
Selects a Team Study from the COVID Watch Program Led by LDI Senior Fellows
Balancing the Perceived Benefits and Risks of Research Participation is No Easy Task for Cancer Patients
Toward A Better Understanding of Patients Perspectives

Hospital Consolidation Continues to Boost Costs, Narrow Access, and Impact Care Quality
A Penn LDI Virtual Seminar Unpacks the Challenging Contradictions of this Continuing Trend