
Health Care Access & Coverage
In Their Own Words
Another Threat to Abortion Privacy? Health Websites Tracking and Sharing Your Data
Researchers Sound the Alarm
The following excerpt is from an op-ed that first appeared in The Los Angeles Times on December 29, 2022.
In the privacy of her home, a woman searches for the nearest abortion clinic. She read a news article about Google deleting abortion search data, so she uses Google to find a clinic just over the border from her state, which recently banned the procedure.
When she visits the clinic webpage, however, Google and Facebook — plus a dozen other companies — record her activity thanks to third-party tracking code embedded on the clinic’s webpage. They know that she clicked on the page to find the clinic’s address, and that she read information on how to prepare for an abortion at that clinic.
Our research team at the University of Pennsylvania’s School of Medicine and Carnegie Mellon’s CyLab found that 99% of abortion clinic webpages surveyed have at least one third-party tracker on their site. The situation is usually worse: The average clinic webpage transfers data to nine different companies. Across all abortion clinics in the U.S., we found that trackers sent data to 66 different companies, from tech behemoths to businesses with little or no consumer-facing presence.
The tracked information can be sold and resold with virtually no limit on how it can be used. Companies can send a woman targeted ads based on her likely having obtained an abortion. Prosecutors in her state can use that data to provide evidence that she did.
Even private citizens can purchase lists of people who visited abortion clinic webpages, then use those names to initiate lawsuits against providers and patients under laws such as Texas’ Senate Bill 8. It may seem shocking that an abortion clinic would transfer visitors’ browsing data to for-profit companies. But the practice is a symptom of an online health privacy crisis that’s been years in the making.
Read the entire op-ed, here.
Authors

Ari Friedman, MD, PhD
Assistant Professor, Emergency Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine

Matthew McCoy, PhD
Assistant Professor, Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine
More from LDI


How Race Distorts One Area of Health Care: The Problem of Race-Specific Tests in Lung Care
Using Different Baseline Lung Function for Black and White Patients Leads to Lower Rates of Diagnosis in Black Patients

Chart of the Day: An Online Education Platform Reduced Pregnancy-Related Anxiety
Study Finds Lower Worry Around Body Image, Delivery, and More for Low-Income, High-Risk Patients

Community Health Workers’ Role Grows With Evidence That They Improve Care and Equity
Benefits Include More Access to Care and Lower Costs, but Funding is Limited

Ending UNOS’s Monopoly Over the U.S. Organ Transplant System
First-Ever Change Aims to Improve Efficiency, Survival, and Equity — But LDI Experts Advise Caution

What Patient-To-Nurse Ratios Mean for Hospital Patient Health and Outcomes
Pennsylvania Legislature Pushed to Take Up Patient Safety Issue It Has Long Avoided

Study Finds Home Health Is Another Care Setting Where Workers Use Harsher Language for Black and Hispanic Patients
Patients Described Negatively, Had Much Shorter Visits According to the First Study of Its Kind on Home Health

Extreme Heat and Health: Understanding the Scope of the Problem
From the 2023 Perry World House Global Shifts Colloquium, “Living With Extreme Heat: Our Shared Future.”