Less Postacute Care for Medicare Advantage Beneficiaries Does Not Mean Worse Health
Research Brief: Shorter Stays in Skilled Nursing Facilities and Less Home Health Didn’t Lead to Worse Outcomes, Pointing to Opportunities for Traditional Medicare
Blog Post
Medicare Advantage Enrollment Was Not Affected by ACA Funding Cuts
Study Suggests Room for More Savings in the Fast Growing Program
Print:
Medicare Advantage (MA)–the private alternative to traditional Medicare–is now projected to enroll more than half of all Medicare recipients this year for the first time. The surge in MA plans has fueled concerns that the program is overfunded, and enables plans to grow by offering gym memberships, dental care, and other supplemental benefits.
Indeed, the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission found that MA plan payments were several percentage points higher than the expected spending of MA beneficiaries if they enrolled in traditional fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare.
Such concerns led researchers to wonder about the effects of future cuts on MA. Could those reductions cause unintended consequences, such as lower enrollment?
In a June study published in JAMA Health Forum, LDI Senior Fellows Aaron L. Schwartz, Amol S. Navathe, and Atul Gupta (with colleague Seyoun Kim) studied the Affordable Care Act’s (ACA) cuts to MA and whether those affected enrollment. The team looked at 3,138 counties for eight years after the ACA took effect, and found that counties with larger cuts to MA plans had similar enrollment growth as counties facing smaller cuts.
“This study extends prior research showing no immediate effects of the ACA on MA enrollment in the one year after ACA reforms,” the authors wrote. “One interpretation of these findings is that the MA program could absorb further payment cuts without shrinking the MA market.”
Still, the authors note, the effects of future MA payment reductions could differ even if they are of the same magnitude.
The study, “Growth of Medicare Advantage After Plan Payment Reductions,” was published on June 24, 2023 in JAMA Health Forum. Authors include Aaron L. Schwartz, Seyoun Kim, Amol S. Navathe, and Atul Gupta.
Author
Karl Stark
Director of Content Strategy
More on Health Care Access & Coverage
The Unseen Fallout of Abortion Bans
How Threatened Reproductive Rights Pushed More Pennsylvanians Toward Sterilization
Parents Need Time, Not Deadlines, After Fetal Diagnoses
Abortion Restrictions Can Backfire, Pushing Families to End Pregnancies
Why Work Requirements Won’t Work for Medicaid
They Reduce Coverage, Not Costs, History Shows. Smarter Incentives Would Encourage the Private Sector
Fragmented Geographic Distribution of Providers Suggests Limited Access to Basic Health Care for Dual Medicaid-Medicare Beneficiaries
Research Brief: Less Than 1% of Clinical Practices Provide 80% of Outpatient Services for Dually Eligible Individuals
One Year, One Enrollment: Continuous Medicaid Eligibility Matters for Kids’ Health
New Findings Highlight the Value of 12-Month Eligibility in Reducing Care Gaps and Paperwork Burdens